![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Supporting Vendors | Active Topics (F) | Photo Gallery | User CP | New Posts | Search | Quick Links | Store | Log Out |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#126 |
New DSMtalker
'92 GVR-4 Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 85 Trader Rating: (0)
Gonzo's Photo Gallery
|
Ken, the porting pics look great! So where do I send mine, and how
long will it take you... ![]() ![]() OK, so that's more than two questions...sorry! ![]() Erik A. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#127 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
Thanks for the compliments. The JDM gaskets looked like I wouldn't reuse them anyway so I have some "mr gasket" or similar do-it-yourself gasket material for that center section. I would need to enlarge the stock gasket holes anyway so I don't think this is too much work. Basically my idea was to trace an outline of the original gasket on top of the new gasket material which will leave me an impression to cut from. But first I would enlarge the holes according to my measurements. The trick is figuring the tolerances for re-assembly, because there is side to side slop in the studs/bolts. This gasket material looks relatively thick, and someone even told me awhile ago that they used RTV without problem. Flowtesting would be awesome. It's hard to not want to do it, me being a numbers guy. All depends how much it costs at a local machine shop I guess. I'd be compelled to do the stock one too as a baseline and as a comparison to Kyle Zingg's numbers. We'll see. From what I understand they measure the mass air flow based on a known variables like pressure, volume and/or temperature. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Super DSMtalker
1991 galant vr4 Join Date: May 2002
Location: denton texas
Posts: 361 Trader Rating: (0)
ho chi inn's Photo Gallery
|
dunno about the gsx, but if you are installing the cyclone on the vr4, you may have to dismantle it to
get it on. then, there are 2 long studs that hold the intermediate runners
to the base, and i had to remove one of them, and replace it with a long
bolt. getting at the lower bolts are a real beyatch, especially the one
lower left side. you WILL have fun with it. if you are keeping your stock
a/c system, you will have to grind off one of the coil bosses to get it to
clear the a/c line. if you are using the cyclone bracket for the surge tank, you will have
to grind the hell out of it, or it will hit the a/c compressor, and if you
are not careful, it will cut the power lines to the a/c clutch. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#129 | |
New DSMtalker
'92 GVR-4 Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 85 Trader Rating: (0)
Gonzo's Photo Gallery
|
Quote:
Thanks, Erik A. #206/1000 | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Super DSMtalker
1991 galant vr4 Join Date: May 2002
Location: denton texas
Posts: 361 Trader Rating: (0)
ho chi inn's Photo Gallery
|
Quote:
yep, that's it. the usa one is different. you have to grind down quite a bit of the part closest to the compressor, or discard the bracket. i like to keep as much as the factory stuff as i can. but, by far, the most difficult is going to be to get the manifold on, and to clear the a/c line. some said to bend the line, i tried, and immediatly, freon started to escape. the line is held to the compressor with just one small 6mm bolt. no way are you going to bend it. also, if you need to have the cyclone ignition coil and output transistor, or at least the transistor bracket, to get it to work. then, some say the ign wires will work, mine would not. i got a set custom made from kingsborne, 25 bucks, they are excellent. lastly, if you dont have the vacuum cannister, i dont think you are going to get it to work properly. | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
New DSMtalker
'92 GVR-4 Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 85 Trader Rating: (0)
Gonzo's Photo Gallery
|
Well, fortunately I have the coil packs and the vacuum canister. I'm
going to need to re-use my power transistor (a la Blackhole's pages), but
I think this will all work. Now I'm just waiting on a phenolic spacer--I
decided that I might as well install one while I have everything apart!
I'm not sure how that will change the fitment, but I'll be sure to let
everyone know. My one remaining concern is that my actuator seems to have
a small leak. ![]() ![]() Erik A. #206/1000 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#132 |
Super DSMtalker
1991 galant vr4 Join Date: May 2002
Location: denton texas
Posts: 361 Trader Rating: (0)
ho chi inn's Photo Gallery
|
both early and late coil packs come on the cyclones. the output
transistor bracket is much different, but you can make the usa one work, i
did. the jdm bracket is MUCH cleaner. i still dont see how anyone can make
the usa ign wires work, unless you leave off the cover, and the wires go
all over the place. if you want to keep the factory loom and wire
placement, you will have to get custom
wires. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#133 | |
Super DSMtalker
96' Mit. Eclipse gst Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atl. GA, Alpharetta
Posts: 489 Trader Rating: (0)
GST2EVO's Photo Gallery
|
Re: Porting Pics and Approx
Measurements
Quote:
the page wont show. __________________ mastr of the 6-bolt. Have YOU loved your DSM today? | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#134 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
To view the pictures
You don't have to, but the only way to view the pictures is to join
that yahoo group. I'm not trying to get new members this way, it was the
only place I could upload pics. Until I have another place to put them
this is the option you have. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#135 |
DSMtalker
1994 TALON DL Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: houston , tx
Posts: 150 Trader Rating: (0)
miketribal's Photo Gallery
|
great ideas... ive installed a cyclone
intake on my gar and i am looking for ways to run the butterfly valves...
besides this is a good thread about cyclone
info i think it should get bumped up
__________________ Mike "Tribal" De La Vega "The Lone Racer" Formerly a 1.8er... may she rest in peace. 1992 Talon TSI AWD jdm 4g63 cyclone powered... and yes my butterflies work... and no dont ask how... just enjoy the fact it does... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#136 |
DSMtalker
1991 GVR-4 782/2000 Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: OH
Posts: 196 Trader Rating: (0)
dsm_sleeper's Photo Gallery
|
![]() Can someone post or e-mail me a vacuum diagram to work the buterflies
correctly? I have the actuator and the white canister with the US TB. Also
which end of the white canister is 'in' and which is 'out'?
Does it just go from the intake to the canister to the actuator? Last edited by dsm_sleeper : 10-10-2002 at 12:21 PM. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#137 |
DSMtalker
95 Eclipse GST Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 175 Trader Rating: (0)
Mike_Black_95_GST's Photo Gallery
|
similar to 93 Ford Escort GT
I once had a 1993 Ford Escort GT. It came stock with a 1.8L DOHC
127HP motor. The intake worked pretty much the same way as this JDM Cyclone intake. On the Escort intake, the short
runners were closed off at lower RPMs...something about the long runners
helping to straighten out the air flow and provide better low-end power.
At 5,500 rpms, a butterfly valve opened up the short runners. On the
Escort, I don't think the intake was designed for more "top end" power cuz
there really wasn't much. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
Super DSMtalker
1991 galant vr4 Join Date: May 2002
Location: denton texas
Posts: 361 Trader Rating: (0)
ho chi inn's Photo Gallery
|
cyclone intake
the cyclone is not designed for more top
end. it is designed to increase torque low end and midrange, which it does
quite well. i have seen a remarkable increase in fuel economy, and feel a
noticeable improvement on response off idle, and mid range cruise. i am
VERY pleased with it. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#139 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
I'm all excited about it, but I'm not going to be able to compare my
notes directly with you guys. I'm bolting the cyclone onto a 4G64/63 hybrid 2.4L. Is anyone else
with a cylcone doing this? Ken |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#140 | |
Super DSMtalker
96' Mit. Eclipse gst Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atl. GA, Alpharetta
Posts: 489 Trader Rating: (0)
GST2EVO's Photo Gallery
|
Re: cyclone intake
Quote:
What method did you use to hook yours up? | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#141 |
New DSMtalker
|
Anyone thought of replacing the butterfly valves with bigger
ones? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#142 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
The butterflies are oval, so you can port the top and bottom a bit
without losing a seal. It will take more travel to do so though. If your
really good at porting and fabbing up your own butterfly plates, then that
will work. If anyone has a busted cyclone manifold it would be a good idea to section it up to find out the wall thickness. It would be a shame to go too far after all that porting. Ken |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#143 |
New DSMtalker
|
Kengsx, Did you find any great difference with the ported cyclone manifold ? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#144 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
![]() Don't know yet. That thing has spent more time on my work bench that
it may ever spend on my car. Porting details are basically done. Next is a
port match with the head (why mitsu ever made the head ports smaller than
the intake manifold ports I'll never know). Then I need to swap engines
after the rebuild. If I name a date I'd have it done, then I'll just be wrong and bitter. So I'll say that sometime before 2007 I will have this conclusive information ![]() Ken |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#145 |
DSMtalker
1991 GVR-4 782/2000 Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: OH
Posts: 196 Trader Rating: (0)
dsm_sleeper's Photo Gallery
|
![]() I'm wondering what set up people are using for this. Are you using
the white canister and a boost controller or
what? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
Who me? I'm using my own DIY canister because mine didn't come with
one. All you need is something that flows one direction and acts as a
reservoir. And some sort of boost controller and pressure switch
combination, possibly used with the JDM throttle body. Not sure yet. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#147 |
Ultra DSMtalker
GrcryGtr Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Traverse City-BigRapids
Posts: 1,108 Trader Rating: (0)
DSMturbo2's Photo Gallery
|
sorry i didnt read through all the posts on this but i doubt this has
been asked. so yell at me if ya want im sorry. but does the cyclone intake help on gas milage by any chance i
could see how it might and wondered if anyone knew anything?
__________________ Erik 1991 GVR4 1189/2k 1992 Eagle Talon TSI (needs home) 1992 Plymouth Laser RS AWD (SeaBass) 1992 Plymouth Laser RS AWD (the Black Car) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#148 | |
Super DSMtalker
1991 galant vr4 Join Date: May 2002
Location: denton texas
Posts: 361 Trader Rating: (0)
ho chi inn's Photo Gallery
|
Quote:
on my last trip to austin, 225 mi each way, i got 28 mpg at 75-85 mph with the a/c on full blast. also, car was over lean, as i had neglected to connect the fuel cannister purge line, and the small hose off of the back of the valve cover. my fuel trims were at 139%, as the ecu was trying desperately to compensate. this is probabaly 4 mpg better than i would usually have gotten at that speed. overall, i have seen about 2 mpg increase in city driving, but the best increase is driveability, increased low and mid range response, and ability to cruise in a higher gear and not bog. but, you MUST have it operating correctly, just connecting the vacuum line will NOT make it work correctly. | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#149 |
Super DSMtalker
1993 Mitsu Eclipse GSX Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 437 Trader Rating: (0)
kengsx's Photo Gallery
|
Short answer: yes, gas mileage should improve Long answer: A higher air charge velocity will result from the intake's longer runners/closed off short runners. This will result in better volumetric efficiency and thus higher low-mid torque due to a thing called Hemholtz theory. More torque would initially sound like more fuel consumption, but what's happening is more than just more air being packed into the cylinders. What is also happening is a more efficient burn. Another thing is that when the short runners are closed, then effectively one of the valves is turned off (has less air coming through it), and most of the charge (which is increased) goes through one valve. This results in better swirling of the air/fuel mix and creates a better burn. Ken |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#150 |
Ultra DSMtalker
GrcryGtr Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Traverse City-BigRapids
Posts: 1,108 Trader Rating: (0)
DSMturbo2's Photo Gallery
|
kengsx
i was pondering this idea what about making an intake with a venturi
built in the runner (runner narrows then gets big again) its my
understanding that this would speed up the velocity of the entering air
and therefore create better burn and voulumetric efficiancy resulting in
more power? you sound like you know what you are talking about. i planned
on posting a new thread asking this ? and i think i still might but any
ideas? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
vBulletin Message | |
Cancel Changes |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (1 members and 0 guests) | |
Flying Eagle |
|
|